Europe is in the downward footsteps of the Roman Empire.

Last weekend (17/10/2026), we all witnessed the horrible escalation of student and youth protests in France, that turned into violence, destruction and civil arrest. The country was in flames with numerous demonstrations ongoing in most of its cities, while sadly, looting of countless local businesses also took place.

However, these protests did not errupt over a weekend. They were ongoing since September even though the media were rarely extensively reporting on them or the reasons behind the student mobilization, not until things turned ugly; it is a well known technique of the European establishment and media, to avoid delving in uncomfortable truths about the state in their countries, or the European Union itself.

These protests were not confined in France alone, but they also occured in Italy, Albania, Greece, Spain, Portugal, Belgium and even Austria and Serbia. Young people marched to protest against the rising cost of living, poor school and economic conditions, teacher shortages, overcrowded classrooms, run-down buildings, and limited public investment in social programs and infrastructure.

Yet, the European elites are turning a blind eye to the fact that the continent's economies are failing, while they support the war in Ukraine, which has cost us billions over the past 4 years, plus more are needed to continue funding a lost war; Ukrainian President Zelensky has asked for further $78 billion in European aid for Ukraine, days before the riots in France turned ugly. Since the United States pulled back from funding Ukraine, Europe has become Kyiv’s chief backer. It has spent more than $255 billion so far, and Ukraine is seeking additional support.

Billions of euros are spent without our consent or opinion in a war, that only continues because of European tax payer's money. Billions that could fund all that the students need and require, or that European families and citizens need to cope with the rising fuel prices, however the EU under Ursula von der Leyen's leadership, opts to spend on supporting a non-EU member, Ukraine.

The result? Europe is burning while Mrs von der Leyen and her collaborators in EU, as well in our governments, continue to revel in the flames, just like the Roman Emperor Nero did, centuries ago. They refuse to listen to the European citizens, who they simply cannot live any longer with rising costs, the degradation of our living standards and all that because the European leadership decided to go to war against Russia and Vladimir Putin. And yet, it is Russia's economy that is failing according to our leaders, forcing the Russians to fight with washing machine parts!

This war was never about supporting Ukraine, rather securing the country's resources, plus counting on a potential Russian defeat, getting additional access to the Russian ones. Europe is getting poorer and is in desperate need of new resources, as the developing world is turning away from Western hegemony, it is forming BRICS and is seeking new ways of conducting business away from the dollar and Western market rules.

Initally the Americans and Europeans were on the same page and staunch in their support of Ukraine, however as we witness lately, USA under Donald Trump's Presidency is clearly moving on from its support for Ukraine, and focusing on America's interests first; something that Europe still hasn't managed to agree on.

Trump announced on October 9 that he had struck a deal to purchase diesel from Russia, pivoting away from a years-old Western policy that placed massive economic pressure on Moscow. The move is expected to strain Washington’s relationships with its European allies. So while the EU citizens are told that the high fuel and goods prices are necessary to support Ukraine, America goes and makes deals with Putin to secure Russian oil, that most likely will end up in Europe, but triple the price.

Consequently, not only we have to spend billions to arm Ukraine, we got to pay higher oil and gas prices, because in their wisdom our leaders decided to cut ties with Russia and apply 20+ rounds of sanctions to harm its economy and force it to wield to Western demands, but now thanks to Trump who went on and started a war on Iran which made the energy costs and shortage even worse, there is no end in sight to the spiraling upwards prices of almost everything!!

And to make matters even worse, the media and social media, focused mostly on the damage and looting that took place in France, but failed to discuss the root of the problem; wasting money on the war in Ukraine, rising fuel costs due to the embargo on Russian energy and the war in Iran, to the detriment of the European economy. The financial powerhouse of our continent- Germany, has been economically stangnant for some years now, since it relied on cheap Russian energy to fuel its growth. Now with the EU sanctions against Russia, persistently high energy prices, competition from China and excessive red tape which are adding to its structural crisis, Germany's export-led economic model faces unprecedented strain just as support for the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party reaches a new peak.

Only in last September, the far-right political party AfD, won key German state election, only falling just short of majority. Alternative für Deutschland surged to victory in Saxony-Anhalt as Friedrich Merz’s CDU slumped to disastrous result. The far-right is rising across Europe for years now, since the economic crisis, the Covid pandemic, the war in Ukraine, the countless refugee crises and now the war in Iran, have eroded European economies and the continent's citizens' living standards for the past 15 years.

Just two days after the French riots, there were demonstrations and counter-demonstration in Copenhagen, Denmark. One of them was organized by the movement Det Danske Folk in central Copenhagen, with slogans supporting what it called “fair and realistic remigration” and opposing Islamization, Sharia law and social control. The counterprotesters gathered under the slogan “No to remigration.”

This comes to no suprise, as the images that were pouring in on social media, showed a dispoportionate number of French youths of immigrant background, notably African-North African, being on the forefront of the looting and violence in most French cities. With countless photographs of non-European rioters being published on social media, another sign of decline as a European society became evident.

Europe’s far right, but also US MAGA supporters, seized on protest violence to push authoritarian anti-immigration agenda across the Western world. Calls for re-migration are becoming more prominent, as they reveal a divided, unequal and toxic society. This is of course partially understandable, as Europe never had a viable solution and clear immigration policies to deal with an issue that has been going on for over a decade now, since the Syrian refugee crisis.

You see, Europeans are dealing with immigration based on ideological debates and divides, while the phenomenon should be approached pragmatically. Left wing leaning politicians, campaigners and followers support the opening of borders and a multiethnic society, believing that "a brotherhood of man" will prevail and a harmonious society will emerge miraculously. The nationalists and right wing suporters on the other hand, support a nation state and less or no immigration at all, something that is unrealistic in the modern world and with economies that rely on immigration for cheap labour.

I am sorry to say, but both are delusional. How many Europeans would aspire to work as kitchen porters and how would anyone expect some jobs to be filled without legal immigration? On the other hand, bringing countless migrants in your country without proper integration or housing and jobs to offer them, while you keep them as second class citizens who rely on benefits and free housing, create bitter angry youths that hate the society they were born in. They consequently are easily radicalized by the Far Left or Islamist organizations and thus in every opportunity they get, they show their discontent.

I am an immigrant myself and although not too often, I also had to face injustice, racism and discrimination in my adopted country, which of course led to temporary bitterness. If these conditions were ongoing for years or generations, when immigrants are cramped in ghettos with no equal opportunities to the rest of the native population, that bitterness becomes toxic, anger, and even hate. So why do European countries import more immigrants than they really want or need? Is it because of the colonial guilt, leftist ideology or a need to portray themselves with an image of an open society, for PR like purposes?

If European nations feel that they need to make up for the damage they did to their former colonies, they could instead repay or assist their former colonies to develop economically, so that their youths can have a future in their homeland. These aspiring migrant young people will have to realize that Europe is not a solution to their problems and only a handfull of them will be successful. Therefore, allowing thousands to settle for years in Europe, since the process of approving or rejecting someone's refugee status across the EU is a very slow process and in many cases like in Ireland, four-in-five asylum seekers issued with deportation orders in the last five years remain unaccounted for, is simply unsustainable.

New Freedom of information figures in Ireland, show that 4,631 deportation orders were issued to people whose application for asylum was rejected between 2018 and last year. The figures show that Gardaí enforced 314 of the orders – which makes up around 7%. The question is why are our governments so slow in applying the law and solving the immigration crisis, when they clearly see that the native population is having enough of paying, and the immigrants are getting frustrated and angry in the process, resulting in a dangerous toxic mix in our societies.

Only last September we saw another migrant crisis taking place, this time in Spain's African enclave, Ceuta. Tens of thousands of people demonstrated across Spain on 2 September over the government's handling of the migration crisis in Ceuta, following weeks of unrest in the Spanish enclave itself. Anger over the arrival of more than 70,000 migrants has developed into sustained mobilization involving residents and migrants, with violence becoming increasingly prominent in late August. Residents have protested against the central government's handling of the crisis and the accommodation of migrants, with some demonstrations escalating into direct attacks on migrants. Migrants, meanwhile, have protested over access to asylum and poor living conditions, with some also clashing with security forces.

The problem is why this continues to happen, why our governments unable to deal with it and potentially who is behind the weaponization of this problem and to what cause. Ultimately, perhaps the Hungarian and Polish approach in this issue is more honest and feasible. I have been recently in Budapest and although it has certainly become a more cosmopolitan multicultural city since I last visited, as you see migrants of all backgrounds working in hotel, tourism and hospitality industries, you notice the lack of refugees and unemployed migrants hanging around, waiting for the application to be approved.

They decline to accept scores of illegal immigrants and opt to control of how many people will get working permits, often clashing with EU institutions and other member states. You may dislike their approach, but it works much better than the pretentious messy reality that exists in Western European nations, which now are struggling to keep the Far Right at bay and from seizing power. The AfD in Germany is vowing to abolish the Schengen and Germany to leave the euro, while in France after the riots, the looting, and the images of young migrants destroying cities and burning historic buildings, the French Far Right leader Marine Le Pen is now widening her lead ahead of 2027 presidential vote, against both centre-right Édouard Philippe and hard-left Jean-Luc Mélenchon.

If both Germany and France move to right-wing, nationalist policies, we may as well forget Europe as we know it. A continent where rich nations vote either to leave EU (Brexit), or never to fully join as the recent rejection of full EU membership by Iceland last August shows us, opting to safeguard national interests against European ones in an increasingly changing and multipolar world. Additionally, we got plenty of poorer nations in Eastern Europe aspiring to become members in order to raise their living standards, but their aspirations are put on hold by the EU and could potentially be entirely derailed, should Le Pen and the AfD win the upcoming elections.

All the above are painting a very sad and bleak picture for Europe and its future, when even its closest ally USA, is turning away from it and seeks to engage with all rising players of a new multipolar world. Europe on the other hand, opts to hold on to outdated ideologies and morality that existed since the end of WW2, the collapse of Communism, the end of the colonization era, and instead of viewing things pragmatically and taking action, they thrive on chewing on old ideas and doctrines, in a never ending philosophical inner struggle.

The only positive occurence of the past 6 months, was when Canada was invited by the EU Commission to become the EU’s first-ever “associate member”, in order for both parties to deal with the increasingly hostile and unpredictable USA, their former close ally. That is a good move, especially if more countries like Australia follow, as is discussed. However, this won't be enough to save Europe from decline, or a social and economic blight. We need to push back against the Far Right in order to maintain what we have built over the past decades, and finally end the war in Ukraine and re-engage with Russia and all BRICS economies. We need cheap energy in order to re-industrialize our continent and catch up with giants such as China and USA in technological achievements, when Europe's amount close to nothing when compared with the two aforementioned competitors.

It is necessary to better the living conditions for Europeans, as is dealing with the migrant crisis effectively, to aspire security, law and order among our citizens, which in turn will stabilize our societies and in extend our economies. If we fail, there is no going back. Europe's future is a stake, but our leaders are proving to be short-sighted, corrupt and increasingly unequipped for this task, hence I fear more riots, instability and even a total collapse of the EU and Europe as a whole and that will be the greatest disaster we will have to live through in our generation.

The beast squeals louder, when it knows it is about to die.

As feared and expected, the great peace-making US President Donald Trump, the one who aspired to receive a Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts to achieve world peace, has started a war in Iran.

It was sadly obvious to many, that it wouldn't take long for a US-Iran war after the recent developments in the country and the ongoing threats by Mr Trump, about an iminent response to the country's recent demonstrations and strikes. We just hoped that reason would prevail; obviously not in US politics.

Naturally this conflict was brewing for much longer, not only between the US and Iran, but in Israel too. The Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu admitted recently after the killing of Iran's former Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei, that he has a long-held desire- a 40 year long one, to deliver a decisive blow to the Iranian "regime". He emphasised the importance of military action for Israel's future, citing unprecedented support from the United States, which for some reason always seem to hop on one leg for their protectorate (or is it vice-versa?). It is also well known that the US and many of its allies in the region, notably Saudi Arabia, always saw Iran as a threat and an adversary to their own interests.

Therefore the two close allies, started bombarding Iran on February 28th 2026, dragging the rest of the world in a most perilous situation. For us Europeans it means that now we won't just have to pay billions of our tax payers money to support the war in Ukraine, which was caused by decades long mistakes of US and European foreign policy towards Russia. Never mind the fact that we were forced to accept millions of war refugees from Ukraine, Syria, Iraq, Bosnia, Somalia and Afghanistan over the past few decades- all result of US military interventions, straining our economies and social cohesion, with the Far Right gaining power everywhere as result.

The same situation will be something that we surely must be prepared to repeat pretty soon again, as the whole region of Middle East is in flames because of Israel's and US interests, or shall we say rampant nationalistic and ego delirium. In addition we must also face the consequence of higher costs of everything, as the price of oil has since the beginning of this war skyrocketed by 20%, with no end in sight.

However for the region of the Middle East, things can't be more dangerous right now. Israel is bombarding Iran but also Lebanon, in order to punish and destroy Hezbollah, the Lebanese Shia Islamist political party and paramilitary group, known for its military and political influence in Lebanon and its close ties to Iran.

In other words, the leadership of both USA and Israel, are tearing up any international laws that exist, in order to achieve their long dreamed goals of US and Israel hegemony in the region, by eliminating any opposing forces. To make sure that no one objects to their plans, they have long accused Iran of human rights violations-of women for example, by the cruel Islamist theocratic "regime" of Iran. But if they took it upon themselves to fix all evils in this world, something that no one has asked them to do, why they do not bomb Saudi Arabia too, for their oppressive theocratic regime, which is in fact worse that the one in Iran? Selective justice we promote, don't we?

Consequently, missiles are currently flying at any direction, as Iran in order to retaliate against its aggressors and avenge the death of many its political and religious leaders- like Ali Khamenei, has its missiles and drones hitting Israeli and US military targets in most Gulf and Levant states since the war broke out, plus Cyprus and Azerbaijan.

They are all sadly coming to terms of their pro-US policies and close relations choices. When you allow military bases of a foreign power, in order to gain protection, favour, money or influence, there will be a day when this foreign power engages in a conflict, that you will also have to pay the price. You are making yourself a target of whoever this country that "protects" you, is fighting against. Somehow USA and Israel have managed to establish military bases all over the Middle East, encircling Iran, yet it was always Iran that was the problem and the aggressor.

Lest we forget, that it was USA under Trump that withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal in 2018, and now they are blaming the Iranians for their aspirations to develop nuclear weapons! Haven't we heard this excuse before? Besides, who decides who gets to have them after all? You see the Americans are a nation that has leaders suffering from megalomania, and think that every country in the world must abide by their wishes and vision for their region, either it is in their interests or not; as long as it serves the 1% of the American and Western elites.

Thus currently we have a raging war in the Middle East, something that costs way too much the US tax payers as Iran has damaged and destroyed 11 US military bases, with a total cost of destroyed American military equipment approached $2 billion, that of course someone will have to pay it one way or another, and it won't be only the American tax payers in the end.

But to make things even more dangerous and worse, it is reported that both Russia and China are assisting Iran in this conflict. Russia in particular is returning the US attitide in the Ukraine war towards Russia, as it is providing intelligence to Iran about U.S. positions, helping them strike considerable damage to US troops.

In other words, not only the US, Israel and Iran are involved in this conflict, but most of the Middle East, plus Russia and China, albeit more cautiously. This can escalate even worse, to a full on War World 3, since the conflicts around the globe do not stop and they keep sprouting like mushrooms everywhere. Naturally this is deliberate and there is a reason for it.

Iran has become a member of BRICS since 2024,an organization created by Russia and China, with the goal of counter balancing US and Western hegemony in the world. The block is for sometime now one of the driving forces behind the world's de-dollarisation efforts and that of course brings them in direct collision with vested US financial and political interests. The US clearly cannot go to into direct war with either Russia and China, as they are both nuclear powers and that will mean a total destruction of the world as we know it. Yet they are getting there slowly.

They use proxies, like Ukraine and now Iran, in order to bully their adversaries into submission. They disregarded all international and humanitarian law in Venezuela, a country aspiring to join BRICS too, regardless of the hurdles it faced by other members of the block. All of them are oil rich nations, and in oil the US economy and world dominance relies upon, together with the use of dollar worldwide as a reserve currency. Take these two together away from US control and you get the picture why America is so pissed with the world ganging up against it and revolting towards its hegemony in recent years.

They are itching against China over Taiwan, against Russia for decades now, North Korea and currently Iran. They are menacing all nations to comply with their interests or else and they even threatened and applied sanctions against their own allies, like U.K, Canada and the EU. They were fixated under Trump to take Greenland, a Danish overseas territory and an allied nation of the US, and the America President is now threatening to attack and interfere with Cuba once again after "he finishes with Iran"!

That is an evident sign that the US is preparing for an all out war, but they do not dare yet to go ahead with it... for now! And what is Europe doing to prepare itself for it or try to avert it? Has it tried to negotiate with or condemn America for its actions, which will affect the already badly affected European economy from the Ukraine war that we are forced to pay? Will it push for Israel and USA to be kicked out of sports and arts festivals and events, like they did when Russia invaded Ukraine? Will we even hit USA and Israel with 20 rounds of sanctions like we did to Russia in an effort to make them stop, or will we perhaps condemn the killing of 175 people, mostly young girls in an Iranian school recently, even when there are mounting evidence that the US was behind this war crime and attrocity? It is highly unlikely.

So far, only Spain out of all EU nations, dared to defy America and say "No to War"! In his familiar bullying style of course, The US president already threatened a trade war against Spain, after being refused the use of Spanish bases for his war with Iran, by the country's PM Pedro Sanchez. But Spain won't budge. Good on them! They obviously remember the consequences they had to suffer, after they agreed to join America in their Iraq war, and the humiliation they endured when it all turned out to be a fiasco of fabricated lies.

As can one clearly see, the US with the help of its protectorate states across the globe, is trying desperately to hold on to what it knows it is about to lose; its hegemony and economic dominance upon the rest of this world. It disregards entirely international laws, which obviously must apply only on its enemies like Russia, but never upon themselves; they are simply above them. They do not care how many people get killed in the process, the desolation they will cause in entire countries and regions for generations to come, the aftermatch and who will have to deal with or be affected by their actions, just as Europe must be prepared for another refugee influx pretty soon.

In Greece we have a saying; "The beast squeals louder, when it knows it is about to die". And that is exactly what we observe happening in the world right now. American and Western elites are exposed since the Epstein files scandal broke out, developing countries are getting organized and speeding up their efforts to counterbalance Western and US hegemony, money is running out due to all the previous wars and corruption scandals, oil is becoming scarce in some areas and there is the need to find new affordable sources. Thus, all states that stand in the way and do not comply or dare to raise their voice and defend their interests are being targeted, excluded, smeared and ultimately attacked.

The world is changing and the old ways that existed since the last wars (WW2), are fading away. The status quo is shifting and new powers emerge, leaving the West-both USA and Europe, scrumbling for importance and relevance. In their desperation to achieve this, they will squeal, cry, threaten, fight, claw and bare their teeth to any new challengers and threats that may face, just as a beast which feels that is fighting its last stand to survival. The problem is for us Europeans though, that America is escalating all its efforts to achieve its goals and they are not afraid to sacrifice our continent to their cause. So what are we going to do about it, are we going to support them to our own detriment and downfall, or will we unite behind Spain, re-engage with Russia and China and all the emerging economies and powers, in order to assert ourselves against US interests?

Our elites' choices will define Europe in the new era and world order, but for now, let's all hope that WW3 will be averted for the benefit of all humanity.

Edi Rama, the Albanian Prime Minister needs coaching on public statements.

On Januray the 15th, 2026 the current Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama, was being interviewed by a Greek-American journalist in Abu Dhabi, during the Sustainable Development Summit. What followed was an episode which highlights how context, humor, and selective media framing can quickly escalate into diplomatic tension.

Speaking directly to the moderator, Rama remarked that Greeks tend to "underestimate others" because they believe they hold a "monopoly on philosophy" and view themselves as the "direct heirs of Plato and Aristotle—but you are not." The exchange escalated when the moderator mentioned a €1 billion investment project in Albania. Rama interjected, correcting that the figure was actually "over €1 billion," then added another jab: "You estimate like Greeks do. When you talk about your own money, you add three zeroes. When you talk about the money of others, you remove three zeroes. That’s what you do." He wrapped up the comment with sarcasm, noting that this approach is "why the European Union loves you so much."

Naturally the Greek media and social media went on fire. However, following the backlash over his remarks about the Greeks , Albania’s PM Edi Rama clarified that his comments were intended as humor, expressing surprise at the scale of the controversy. He pushed back against Greek media outlets, accusing them of a “public attack fueled by nationalist passion.” He insisted his comments were “steeped in friendly humor” and taken out of context. To reassure his critics, Rama added, “I have not the slightest doubt that Plato and Aristotle are Greek philosophers and that Ancient Greece is the cradle of European civilization.” However, he ended with a sharp retort, stating that, while he respects Greek culture and the Prime Minister, he refuses to accept that those attacking him with “nationalist fervor” are the rightful descendants of such great philosophers.

In an interview with the Greek television station Alpha, Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis adopted a calm and pragmatic approach. He stated:“I have known Mr. Rama for many years. He has a particular way of expressing himself and sometimes things slip out that he should not say. This time he said something inappropriate and understood his mistake. I take into account the correction he made, and it is better to leave the issue behind us.”

Personally I think that both Mr Rama and Albania as a country, behave like individuals with inferiority complexes; yet they should not really! The "jokes" were made by the Albanian PM towards a Greek-American journalist if I may add, an American with Greek ancestry, who may not be really aware of what is going on latelly in Albania.

His Greek ancestry is not an invitation or an excuse to make jokes about Greece as a country, especially when they are unprovoked. Nothing that the journalist asked, invited the "humour" of Mr Rama. And to make matters worse, the Albanian PM in his "clarification" stated that he has no doubt that Plato and Aristotle were Greek, yet he did not exactly disputed that in his comments towards the journalist, rather that the modern Greek population has anything to do with them. Something that he expressed again when he complained about the backclash he caused, by refusing to accept that those attacking him with “nationalist fervor” are the rightful descendants of such great philosophers.

One can sense the complex and envy in his words, like for example the "joke" on why the E.U loves Greece so much, when Greeks in general and as a nation, estimate like the way we do. When we talk about our own money, we add three zeroes. When we talk about the money of others, we remove three zeroes.

Stereotypes in general are not a good thing. Mr Rama should remember the famous film "Taken", and how the villains in this movie were an Albanian mafia, trafficking girls across Europe for sexual exploitation. It is not any of us Greeks that are to be blamed for this indeed very unfair portrayal and sterotype that the Albanian people must carry. Our Balkan neighbors must do some soul searching to figure out why and how this came to be, plus find ways to undo this bad image that exists for them across Europe and the rest of the world. But this won't happen by attacking the Greek people and their history, but by proving to the rest of Europe what does Albania has to offer as a nation; and it has-a lot.

Clearly the Greek side over-reacted and unleashed scathing attacks against Rama and the Albanian people in general, which serve as nothing more rather than releasing internal anger and frustration, and as Mr Rama said a misplaced "nationalist passion". However I understand where this comes from and why my compatriots reacted in such way.

We too had to deal with unfair and misplaced stereotypes in Europe, for over a decade now since the Eurozone economic crisis. The Greeks had also to suffer humiliation, economic suffering and injustice to this day, and that made us oversensitive to any such comments and jokes like that of Mr Rama.

In addition, there are numerous social media accounts from our neighboring countries like Albania, Turkey and North Macedonia, spreading false claims, irredentism and propaganda about Greek history, borders, nationality, ethnic identity and the very "jokes" that Mr Rama made; that Greeks are not descended from our ancient ancestors. All of which are false and it has been proven that Greeks are indeed related to their famous forefathers, although understandably not exclusively. You see nationalism and its "passion" goes both ways and is not confined only within the Greek borders. Our Balkan neighbors also suffer a great deal from it.

Now, nobody I know of Greek origin, wakes up in the morning, looks himself in the mirror and boasts about his ancient heritage. We got lots of other problems to solve in our everyday lives, plus as a modern nation. But when it comes to a continuous belittlement, disputes that become toxic, humiliation by our EU partners, scorn by Western media etc, then yes we will answer back just like Mr Rama did when he found himself in hot waters after his comments, and his compatriots that rallied to support him on social media.

Greece was among the first countries, together with Italy, which opened its borders and welcomed thousands of Albanian immigrants when their country was faced with the collapse of communism, gave them work and helped them to rebuilt their lives. I worked with many of them in my youth and my experiences were largely positive. Additionally, those immigrants contributed hugely in the Greek society and economy, something that is undisputed to this day. Not that there were no problems in this new reality that both countries found themselves in.

Greek media fanned the Greek "nationalistic passion," just like today and in every country, by blaming all crimes on "foreign born" criminals. As if suddenly the Greek ones disappeared and migrants from Romania, Albania and Georgia took their place. However, Albanian criminal gangs did indeed commit lots of crimes back then, that is something that cannot be disputed; just the notion that every immigrant in Greece, especially from Albania, was enganging in such activities.

Our two nations have long history of living and working together, sometimes fighting each other or finding themselves on opposing sides. But that is true for all European nations. The difference is, that once in the EU- whose role was originally conceived as to abolish all wars and animosity among the European nations, such sentiments should fade away. A member of the block cannot engage in such demeanor towards another EU member state; especially its Prime Minister who speaks and represents the nation diplomatically abroad, and is not some internet Albanian troll with a fake account on social media, that scorns the Greek people and history in such manner.

That is why many Greeks like myself, see very favorably Albania's EU accession, when the rest of Europe is ready to take them in. It is not Greece that is sceptical about Albania's EU aspirations, rather the rest of the continent which suffers from expansion fatigue, plus each individual member state is faced with their own economic woes lately. You see Mr Rama, the EU does not "love us" more than they love Albania, rather we were only lucky to get in the club, before thigs started to feel sour in EU on expansion.

Where in EU's recent treatment of Greece you whitnessed that European leaders and media are being favorable towards us to have so much envy and an underlined complex towards our country, that in any opportunity which arises, you make "jokes" towards an American citizen of Greek ancestry? Which begs the question then, why you spoke so favorably for Italy and its Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, to whom you even kneeled to welcome her in a recent summit in Tirana? Are the Italians true descendants of the Romans, or has Italy done more than Greece to help fleeing Albanian citizens back in the '90s, or maybe their treatment of Albanian refugees was better than how we treated those who crossed into our country en masse?

Perhaps Italy is more vocal and supportive towards the Albanian EU accession than Greece? No matter what the reasons are, such comments do not do any favors to Albania as a country, the Greek-Albanian relations that should be as close as those you got with Italy, or any EU aspirations that your country may have. It is not proper or suitable for a Prime Minister of a country to make unfortunate "jokes" towards an allied nation in NATO, hopefully an EU partner, just because and American journalist that had a Greek surname, asked you a few wrong questions. Albania deserves better than that.

Will the rift among the Western alliance be fixed, but most importantly, should it?

I have always been a pro-European and believed wholeheartedly that Europe should one day distance itself from USA, forging new trade agreements and alliances with all emerging economies and new "powers" of this world. It is in its own best interests, that our continent should be preparing for the inevitable; a multi-polar world.

However, the way I envisioned that happening was that one day, a gifted and visionary group of European leaders would arise and see that Europe cannot forever remain a follower, a sidekick of US interests. That it would be us that would break our dependency on US "protection" and weaning ourselves off their money, military support and influence.

Well, clearly as we have seen since the outbreak of Covid-19 and the war in Ukraine, Europe lacks good leadership and it is increasingly descending into irrelevence and economic decline. To my surprise, it was in fact America under Donald Trump, that created the greatest rift among the traditional alliance between USA and Europe, plus even Canada. We can say that he gave us a "good kick up the backside" as we say in Ireland.

For the past month, US President Trump was insisting on a most absurd idea, that Greenland should become a US territory... Greenland; an autonomous territory of Denmark, a fellow NATO country and an ally of USA. An ally demanding from an allied nation to cede some of its territory, because of US "national security" reasons, or most correctly the whims of an increasingly mentally unstable US President"

That of course would not be the first time that something like that happened in the NATO "alliance", as Turkey's President Erdogan was threatening Greece for years on Twitter (now X platform), with a bombing of Athens or annexation of Greek islands in typical Trump way, plus the two countries have been in dispute over the Aegean for ages, as Erdogan pushes for Turkey’s ‘Blue Homeland’ doctrine. A Turkish "wet-dream" literally, that sees Greece for whatever reason, accepting to cede some of its Greek islands to Turkey. What did the rest of Europe and America do to support Greece? Nothing basically, they just sat there asking for the two countries to "work things out," for now... Until the next time Erdogan wakes up on the wrong side of his bed.

Protests broke up in Denmand and Greenland, to oppose to Trump's annexation plan for the Danish territory while the EU was faced with yet another tariff threating tirade from Trump. Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, Britain, the Netherlands and Finland, fellow NATO members that have expressed solidarity with Denmark in its refusal to yield to Mr. Trump’s demands, would be subject to 10 percent tariff. "If those nations do not relent", Donald Trump added, the rate will increase to 25 percent on June 1, “until such time as a Deal is reached for the Complete and Total purchase of Greenland.”

In an effort to show support for Denmark and send a message to Trump, a number of European countries decided to send troops to Greenland, in a most bizarre development in NATO history, when we saw alliance members ganging up to protect a territory from another. Somehow I felt justified, when for years I was supporting the view that while Europe is so keen to fend off Russia in the East, it totally made itself vulnerable and exposed at it's own back. We should not be as dependent on USA anymore, simply because as we see in their recent behaviour, they are a country that is going through its own soul searching and internal struggles, which consequently will only use Europe in order to solve them and maintain its grip on our continent and the rest of the world. Somehow "I told you so," never felt so good.

On the other hand, Greenlanders and the Danes, should be a bit more grateful and happy, that they at least got the 15 German soldiers among others from Sweden, Norway, Finland, the Netherlands and the UK. This is far more than Greece ever got from its "allies" to showcase their support against Erdogan. Now what would this mini force do against America, if it decided to invade Greenland and take the island by force, is another question. Possibly the move was only symbolic. Besides, Germany withdrew its military after just two days, in an effort to explore the conditions for possible military contributions to support Denmark in ensuring security in the region.

And all that chaos and fiasco, just because Trump wanted Greenland for its natural resources, which include rare earth minerals, uranium and iron, plus also potential significant oil and gas reserves.Trump has focused on such resources elsewhere - including in his dealings with Ukraine - but denies they are behind his desire for Greenland. However he has repeatedly described the threat he perceives from Russia and China in the region (excuse me, what?). In one Truth Social post, he wrote: "Nato has been telling Denmark, for 20 years, that 'you have to get the Russian threat away from Greenland.' Unfortunately, Denmark has been unable to do anything about it. Now it is time, and it will be done!!!"

That ridiculous claim, that America "needs" Greenland for national security and to prevent Russia and China from taking it, was echoed by the German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, obviously in an efford to appease Trump and find common ground to solve this impasse among the NATO alliance. However it does not make it any less nonsensical. Greenland is a Danish territory, a country which is in NATO. If for whatever reason China (??) or Russia- which NATO leaders mock that it cannot even take Ukraine after 4 years of war, attempted to invade and take over it is clear that they would have to deal with NATO. If they tried to take over by trade agreements, they would after all have to come to an accord with Denmark too, as although autonomous, Greenland is heavily relying on Denmark and is heavily subsidised by it, to support its economy.

Besides, America has already operated Pituffik Space Base - formerly known as Thule Air Base - since World War Two. The base currently monitors for missiles. They could just secretly and quietly seek to settle another base there or enhance what they already have, in agreement with Denmark and Greenland if they worried so much about NATO security, instead of staging all this parody which made NATO look ridiculous and an utter joke to the world stage. As Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned, a U.S. invasion of Greenland would spell the end of NATO. And it really should, if this happens again.

As of today, Monday the 26th of January 2026, Trump eased off Greenland threats. After negotiations among NATO leaders last week in the Swiss town of Davos and the World Economic Forum, it has been speculated from sources that the US stationing agreement for Greenland is to be reworked and take into account the planned US "Golden Dome" missile defense system that Trump wants to build. The USA should also have a say in investment projects from other countries in Greenland, plus there are also plans to increase the involvement of European NATO states in the Arctic region.

In other words, USA pushes for its own agenda and muzzles in on who will be doing business with who in Europe, just like they did many times before. Their economy is in trouble, their empire needs to expand in order to survive, thus Greenland, Venezuela, Iran are happening now. They want to install more missiles abroad no matter the consequences for others, and then both USA and its "colony" of Europe will cry foul if Russia and China do the same to countries they see as important to them. When will Europe refuse to be manipulated and controlled in such way by USA? Just because our leaders are used to this status since WW2, in which America is the protector and "big daddy" of our continent and we are afraid to invest in our own defense, (who will attack Europe by the way, Russia which "can't take Ukraine after 4 years of war", or perhaps America which also acts as our protector?) and finally map our own destiny to become independent from everyone.

And this reluctance is so ingrained in the European political elites, that the current NATO Chief Mark Rutte today made a statement in the European Parliament of all places, that Europe cannot defend itself without the United States. "If anyone thinks here again, that the European Union, or Europe as a whole, can defend itself without the US -- keep on dreaming. You can't," he shamelessly declared, and he went on to describe that EU countries would have to double defence spending from the five percent NATO target agreed last year to 10 percent and spend "billions and billions" on building nuclear arms.

Such a brown-tongue approach, so submissive and with lack of vision and honesty explains clearly why Europe will always be an underdog to the US. We do not need to invest to build nuclear arms to stand on our own accord Mr Teflon-Mark, just coordinate and develop what we already got. France has already nuclear weapons. Europe can never have its own foreign policy, or any other independent policy for that matter, if it keeps relying on USA for its defense. But Mr Rutte is yet another failed and scandal ridden European politician, that after boot-licking America and other European institutions controlled by them, found a new job that is designed to keep Europe under the influence of America for ever.

It is a case that the Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said it best in Davos. He described of a rupture in the world order, the end of a pleasant fiction and the beginning of a harsh reality, where geopolitics, where the large, main power, geopolitics, is submitted to no limits, no constraints. On the other hand, other countries, especially intermediate powers like Canada, are not powerless. They have the capacity to build a new order that encompasses their values, such as respect for human rights, sustainable development, solidarity, sovereignty and territorial integrity of the various states. The power of the less power starts with honesty.

For decades, countries like Canada (and cleary most of Europe) prospered under what we called the rules-based international order. We joined its institutions, we praised its principles, we benefited from its predictability. And because of that, we could pursue values-based foreign policies under its protection.We knew the story of the international rules-based order was partially false that the strongest would exempt themselves when convenient, that trade rules were enforced asymmetrically. And we knew that international law applied with varying rigour depending on the identity of the accused or the victim.

This fiction was useful, and American hegemony, in particular, helped provide public goods, open sea lanes, a stable financial system, collective security and support for frameworks for resolving disputes. So, we placed the sign in the window. We participated in the rituals, and we largely avoided calling out the gaps between rhetoric and reality. This bargain no longer works. We are in the midst of a rupture, not a transition.

Over the past two decades, a series of crises in finance, health, energy and geopolitics have laid bare the risks of extreme global integration. But more recently, great powers have begun using economic integration as weapons, tariffs as leverage, financial infrastructure as coercion, supply chains as vulnerabilities to be exploited. You cannot live within the lie of mutual benefit through integration, when integration becomes the source of your subordination.

This is the first time the truth is being said by a Western politician and leader, so openly and clearly. Sadly, these words do not come from the mouth of a European, all of them who still opt to boot lick America in a desperate effort to maintain the dying status-quo. It is a shameful and disappointing observation, surely painful to admit. But it is a promising one, since a country like Canada decided to call things by their name. This fiasco is an opportunity for Europe to wake up and take action, but by the looks of it, they will fail once again.

Who is going to stand up and save the world from US entitlement?

Something outrageous and unthinable happened at the dawn of 2026. U.S. striked Venezuela and captured its President Nicolas Maduro, in a swift operation that took place without the approval of the UN, or the US Congress itself. It is illegal by international and US law, yet somehow the world is just watching and tolerating yet another US illegal takeover and bullying of another country.

US President Donald Trump even blatantly stated that "we're going to run the country" for now", after Maduro's removal, or shall I say literal kidnapping from Caracas, the Venezuelan capital. The move comes as after months of tensions between the two countries and attacks on boats by the US, accused of carrying drugs from the South American country, something that was never officially proven. President Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela said the U.S. military operations were a thinly veiled effort to oust him from power.

Maduro was open to talks with the US on drug trafficking allegations, just two days before America invaded Venezuela and kidnapped its president. But as usually, the self righteous Americans did what they do best; ignored international law, the UN, the sovereignty of another nation, and they "yeehawed" into Venezuela to establish their will, dominance and own economic interests.

The relationship between the two nations was always complicated, since former Vnezuelan President Hugo Chávez took office as president of Venezuela. Chávez declared himself socialist and "anti-imperialist", in reference to being against the government of the United States. Tensions between the countries increased further after Venezuela accused the administration of George W. Bush of supporting the 2002 Venezuelan coup d'état attempt against Chávez. Accusations which they later withdrew.

The reason for all the above of course, is one; oil! Americans want it desperately and they will stop at nothing in controlling as much of it as they can, no matter where it comes from. But ever since Venezuela nationalized it's oil reserves, America found an excuse to meddle in their country. Especially after Hugo Chávez officially took office in February 1999, several policy changes involving the country's oil industry were made to explicitly tie it to the state under the Bolivarian Revolution. That meant that nationalizing heavy oil projects in the Orinoco Petroleum Belt which formerly operated by international oil companies ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips and Chevron, obviously caused unwanted ripples in the oil market, in which USA relies so much.

Not that Chavez or Maduro are examples of good leadership or democracy, as they both mismanaged their country's resources, they installed people close to them in key positions in their country's oil industry and corruption was widespread. However that does not give USA the right to "fix" other nations, without the approval of the UN. But when it was actually the last time that America played by the rules that they themselves call upon when their adversaries like China or Russia, do something wrong? Was it during the Iraq war that they blatantly lied about the alleged "weapons of mass distruction", that existed in Iraq and threatened US national security?

Many Venezuelans are celebrating outside their country the fall of Maduro, since the country's economy was in a bad shape for years. Partially because of corruption and their leaders' mismanagement, but do not forget the barrage of US blockades, sanctions since 2006 and oil embargo since 2019. This is a very well known policy of US, that somehow wherever there is oil, some dictator or "regime" is in power which the heroic, always benevolent Americans see fit to oust, replace and liberate the country by installing a new regime that is friendly to their own interests.

They break the country's economy with sanctions, so that the people suffer and they eventually become keen for a government change. In addition they fund the opposition, or they simply appoint and recognize them, or award them with a Nobel Peace Prize. My enemy's enemy is my best friend, right? Then all they have to do is stirr unrest and tighten the economic sanctions, until the citizens come to a breaking point, and there the Westerners get their legitimacy for intervention.

Something like this is also happening to Iran now, and it actually happened before in the same country many times over. The US helped oust Iran’s government in 1953 and reinstate the Shah, which in turn brought as result the Islamic Revolution, since the Shah was very unpopular after a few years in power. We all know the outcome of this to this day. But even now, Iran hasn't escaped US intervention, as Iran's currency depreciation 'brought about by US sanctions' and government 'mismanagement'. An economic mismanagement of course, according always of course to Western media.

The people of Iran are suffering and just like Venezuelans, feel the need to a "change". They are currently protesting in their country and it is not a coincidence that all this is happening at the same time with the events in Venezuela. The US President Donald Trump has already threatened the Iranians, that he is ‘locked and loaded’ to back demonstrations, again just like all the benevolent and freedom fighting US governments have done in the past, meddling in another country's affairs and offer solutions to an internal struggle that they helped to be created.

Little do both the Venezuelans and the Iranians currently know or remember in their desperation now to overthrow the current "regime", is what happens once their country is "saved by the God blessed America". Just take a look at Libya, where people there were so keen to get rid off Gaddafi in the past, that they also celebrated his downfall. Fourteen years later and Libya is in a worse state, a "fractured state" and a failed one by all means.

That will be the future of Venezuela too. A civil war may occur between those loyal to Maduro and the current establishment and those supporting change. The US will no doubt establish a friendly to them regime in the country (as Trump already declared), that will make it easier for them to rob Venezuela of its own oil. With the tolerance of the rest of us, and shamefully the collaboration of Europe.

So our continent tolerates all this, setting an example for anyone that wishes to annex a country, rob of its resources or proceed to a regime change, just to go ahead and act on it. I wonder what the European leaders will do, if Russia does the same to Ukraine's President Zelensky. Or if Trump, now unbothered by anyone, just goes and annexes Greenland as he already stated and expressed his interest of accomplishing. What if China copies US example and takes over Taiwan in the same way? Where do we draw the line, plus a most pressing matter; what will happen with Trump's Nobel Peace Prize aspirations now? Clearly he is not qualified for it under the circumstances.

Joking aside, how can we as European have the nerve to lecture or sanction Russia or China to abide by international law, when America can so blatantly go and piss on it so arrogantly and provokatively, and all that the European leaders can say is that they are "supporting the Venezuelan people". Which ones exactly, only the ones who oppose Maduro, or the country as whole which was humilated in the globe by having its own leader dragged away by another government, which is going to judge and trial him according to their own laws?

Will there ever be sanctions against America, somebody to finally stop them from taking it upon themselves to bring their own solutions to problems they partially created with their foreign policy? America is obviously desperate for resources now, as is Europe after financing the war in Ukraine for years, thus Venezuela will pay the price.

So far, no mention of the damage done or the number of victims that this "operation" by the US have had in Venezuela by our own Western media. Just celebrations and "concerns", support for the future- no matter what that means for the stability of the country or the region as a whole and Latin America as a continent. The world passively watches yet another US war crime, and tolerates it. I think it is about time that the rest of the world ganged up against the US and copied a page out of their own book; kidnap their President and trial him, saving the American people from the lunacy of their leaders.

Swedish "mafia", redefines corruption and the migration crisis in Europe.

Recently I came across and artice in EU Observer : "From welfare to 'Wild West': The man who profited from Sweden’s refugee crisis", which is part of a series of investigations conducted by Dutch investigative collective Spit and Italian publication Altreconomia into Europe's privatised migration market across six countries: Italy, Albania, Sweden, the Netherlands, and the UK.

In this story, we learn how a former member of the progressive left in Sweden turned the 2015 refugee crisis into a lucrative business, exploiting not only the people who had fled wars and persecution with housing in Sweden, but also his own country and affecting Europe as a whole to an extend. The business exploits of Jan Emanuel, a former socialist member of the Swedish parliament, have led to a soul-searching of a welfare state that gives an outward image of offering everyone high-quality publicly funded services in the Scandinavian nation.

Sweden in the 2000s had already outsourced most of its welfare sector to private companies (wait, what?). And Emanuel's case, a reality TV star turned new-public-management capitalist, demonstrates an even deeper pivot towards the capitalisation of public services. At one point, he became Sweden's most expensive refugee contractor, billing the state €10,000 per month per child: €2,100 for the family where the child was staying.

As Sweden grappled with some ten thousand people arriving every week during the fall of 2015, the opportunities to outsource the public services to the private sector exploded. It was an unprecedented influx for a state that, up until then, had the capacity to take in only 2,500 per week.The total number of refugees reaching Sweden in 2015 was 162,877, of which 70,000 were minors. Half of the minors came alone.While Germany had received the highest number of refugees in Europe in 2015, Sweden received the most per capita.

The article continues to describe how Emanuel set up his first "business"- HVB-homes: care homes for homeless and runaway youth.Youth care is the part of the welfare sector where privatisation has penetrated deepest, with 90 percent of HVB-homes being run by private contractors.His homes were soon criticised for understaffing. One of them promised 24 hour-staffing, but in reality, the nighttime staff was Jan Emanuel himself, who dropped by once in a while.

But it all went wrong in the end, as at his care home outside Uppsala, where unaccompanied minor refugees were housed, crimes were reportedly rampant. Meanwhile, Emanuel became part of former Social Democrat PM Göran Persson's circle, which was awash with men wanting to make a quick buck, many of them securing a well-paid job in banking or lobbyism after leaving politics. One of them was Per Nuder, often referred to as ”Sweden's most well-paid lobbyist,” who helped Jan Emanuel sell his HVB company for €2.2m, whereof Nuder's own share was €1.2m.

And this criminal activity spread throughout Sweden and across Europe as well. A total of 278 new companies specialising in the care of unaccompanied minors were founded just in the fall of 2015. About 14 percent have registered criminals on the executive board, while some have ties to organised crime, such as the motorcycle mafia Bandidos.

This revealing article, should be making headlines across Europe, however our media focus on the war in Ukraine and other issues, to turn our attention away from the crimes committed by such individuals, to the detriment of all: European citizens and migrants alike. Firstly, it is very interesting that this case comes from Sweden, a country often portrayed as a model for every other European nation; low criminality and corruption, high living standards, stable economy, progressive views on social issues, including migration.

The reality is very dissimilar as it seems. If such scandals took place in Bulgaria, Greece, Romania or Italy, the European press would be quick to make them known and blame these nations for Europe's migration woes. But when it comes to Sweden, a poster child of European leftist liberalism, the story is quite different.

In addition, European media usually blame "human traffickers" of third nations in north Africa, the Middle East or Turkey for the massive influx of migrants and refugees, but never people like Emanuel, individuals with strong and good connections and part of the political fabric of each EU member state. You see if they expose these individuals, the story of the so called "refugee crisis" that Europe is facing for over a decade now, quickly becomes a money making scheme for some of the European elites and other opportunists like Emanuel, to the detriment of European tax payers, that are asked to pay the bill as always.

So how will this narrative, to maintain this multicultural model that European elites pushed for in decades hold, or the "refugees welcome" movement, when it becomes clear that it is all a hoax, a exploitative scheme and nothing more? How will our ruling elites justify their actions and policies they adopted, if articles like these expose the corruption involved?

You see, it is easier to blame Belarus or Putin for engaging in a "hybrid war" against the so called liberal free democracies of Europe, by pushing thousands of refugees into EU member states, but who is going to hold these individuals like Emanuel accountable, for the damage the do to European societies for their own profit? Who is going to deal with the mess they are creating?

And so basically Sweden is considered progressive in its policies by privatising everything, even its own welfare sector to private companies, while other countries in EU- predominantly from the South and Eastern regions, are deemed as "backwards", just because they do not follow suit. As if privatising every state company or organization, is the way forward and something that needs to be copied from everyone, if they want to achieve the high-standards of Sweden's social and economic policies.

Well, I would not think so anymore. When you pass ownership to private companies of your welfare sector, you basically give power to individuals like Emanuel to make profit, while your tax payers and citizens are asked to pay and live with the consequences. And latelly we can witness the results of such crazy policies, when Finland and Sweden boasted the highest unemployment rates in October 2025, together with Spain.

It is not "progressive" to privatize all state bodies and organizations, especially those who deal with immigration and social welfare of the state. You are technically passing all responsibility and power to private owners, who in turn can turn your country into whatever they want, according to their interests and not necessarily the interests or wishes of your citizens. I am sorry but it must be the state that is held accountable by a parliament and the in extend the voters, that should maintain all controll and accountability.

Not that in nations that do not go down this way, there is no corruption or abuse of power, but at least they are not hailed as "progressive" in a mockery of the situation and only to promote an agenda or this rampant liberalism and faux progressiveness that has gripped Europe latelly, and which our elites tried to sell to us as the new norm. In addition, the result and consequences of this madness, is quite the opposite of what one would expect.

The Sweden Democrats, is a nationalist and right-wing populist political party in Sweden founded in 1988. As of 2024, it is the largest member of Sweden's right-wing bloc and the second-largest party in the Riksdag. Sweden, after resisting the Far Right and populism for years, has finally gone down the road of many other European nations, by turning to nationalism for solutions.

And people like Emanuel, jump on the rightwing populist trend, after for years posing as Leftwing Liberals. He is now a frequent guest on podcasts, he declares that there are too many immigrants and if they can't adapt, they need to get out, as he poses admiringly next to controversial British-American influencer Andrew Tate in a TV show.

Consequently, thousands of immigrants are caught in a system that basically never cared for their welfare and only brought them into Europe to profit from their presence and desperation. They find themselves in a continent that increasingly turns against them, profiling them as "free loaders", "muslim cancer", "third world colonists that will turn Europe into their lands", as they are caught in a system that wants them to remain second class citizens, so it can blame them for everything in the future.

As for the European citizens, they are also lied to by their own governments and media, that the problem of migration is brought upon them by outside enemies of Europe like Putin, or corrupt human traffickers in poor countries and that we have no other option but to accept millions of migrants that we cannot integrate, do not want them to assimilate into our societies, thus resulting to the rise of the Far Right across our continent; something that can only mean trouble for the future for everyone in Europe; divisions, segregation, economic downturn, limitations of freedoms for both natives and immigrants, limitations of freedom of movement and ultimatelly everything that Europe allegedly stood for.

This is shamefull and not only for Sweden, but for all Europe as a whole since this is surely not a strictly Swedish phenomenon. As this article explores and states, this incidents also affect the Netherlands, the UK, Italy and Albania so we are talking a pan-European issue that has been kept under wraps by our media and politicians, so the European elites cannot be held accountable for the grave mistakes, corruption and sell-off of European wealth and indentity or values. It is time to expose them and realize that we are been lied upon. The enemy is not the migrants, but politicians and opportunists like Emanuel, who with their connections and money, are destroying our nations and continent and are themselves in turn supported or covered by powerfull elites, with suspicious, dangerous agendas.

Europe has become a continent of folly, corruption and dangerous delusions.

In the recent months we have seen worrying and sometimes outrageous developments taking place in Europe, regarding the war in Ukraine.

Europe refuses to accept that this war is unwinnable and insists on keep throwing billions into it, while the US under President Trump is showing signs of caution and efforts to end this conflict, perhaps to the detriment of Ukraine. European politicians deny as usual to listen to their citizens, which are now increasingly sceptical of this war's direction and outcome, plus fearful of further escalation to an generalized warfare between Europe (with or without the US) and Russia.

As always, European leaders, media and the EU leadership under Von der Leyen won't listen to anything else, but the continuation of the support and thus, the perpetuation of this conflict. One after the other, our leaders are using Russia as a boogeyman to explain to us the need of spending billions of our money for the continuation of this conflict. The NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, warned us that " Russia could attack Nato within five years", while British Chief of the Defence Staff Air Chief Marshal Sir Richard Knighton, claimed that "British families must be prepared to send their sons and daughters to war against Russia".

Yet, they were only two of Europeans that made such statements, others from across our continent also joined in to this farsical theatre, while USA is seemingly the only Western country willing to still negotiate with the Russians. However, it is dawning on Europe now, that "Europe will need to engage with Putin if US peace talks fail", as French President Emmanuel Macron admitted last week , during a press conference of a European Union leaders' summit, in Brussels, Belgium. Well, it better not be him again leading the negotiations, because it was Mr Macron who called Vladimir Putin three days before the Russian invasion which ended up in disaster, and every attempt of these two solving their differences ever since, failed to produced any results.

In contrast, Russia's President Vladimir Putin in a recent statement from Bishkek in Kyrgyzstan, branded fears that Moscow is planning to invade another European nation as ‘ridiculous’ and ‘complete nonsense’. To be honest, one minute Europeans mock Russia for failing to take Ukraine after three years of war, but now they are scaremongering us that they will attack the whole of Europe (and thus NATO), which will result to an all out war between Europe and Russia. Such an outcome and without the full commitment of USA, since under Trump it is doubtful if America will participate actively in this war, would be disastrous for our continent. The Americans most likely will wait it out and resolve on selling weaponry to an ever indebted Europe, and only when we are on our knees they will decide to step in, to make sure we are once more for ever relying on them for funds, weapons and "protection".

In their desperation to find resources and funds to continuing their support for Ukraine, EU leaders were engaging in weeks long debates and diplomatic activity, to use billions of euros in frozen Russian assets to help cover Ukraine’s war needs over the next two years. But Belgium pushed back and eventually managed to block such plan, arguing that the plan carries legal and financial risks that it fears it could end up shouldering alone. And it has every right to do so, as if things turn sour, Belgium would indeed be the country that payed the highest price.

Belgium worries that Euroclear – the Brussels-based financial clearing house that holds the bulk of the frozen Russian assets – could end up entangled in damaging litigation if Russia challenges the EU decision. Besides, it is not as if the EU would just grab and take Russian money from Belgium, but they would rather get a loan on these assets, to be used for supporting Ukraine. But who would end up paying, if Russia succeeded in challenging successfully such move? We, the European citizens would of course. The worse affected country would be Belgium, however the bill would be footed by tax payers money once again, to limit the total financial catastrophe of Belgium, a key EU member state.

Naturally, as we are well used in Europe, double standards came into play once again. Nobody called for sanctions against Belgium, for the country to "be kicked out of the EU", or for funds to be withheld from the Belgians, like they did with Hungary and Slovakia on numerous occasions; simply because they were safeguarding their own national interests. The two Visegrad nations, have jointly blocked the adoption of the European Union’s 18th sanctions package, aimed at further punishing Russia. The decision was a direct response to Brussels’ proposal to ban the import of cheap Russian oil and gas, a move that would severely harm the two nations' energy security and potentially double or triple utility costs for households.

Where is the difference to what these two were doing back then, from what is Belgium doing now? You cannot cut off ties with Russian energy products just like that, this takes years in preparation and a more step-by-step approach, however the EU wants its member states to achieve this in a few years, no matter how much this actually hurts Europe's own interests. Just as you cannot take a risk such a Belgium was asked to take, which could severly affect your economy.

Instead, what we got now is an agreement on a 90 billion loan to Ukraine, which will be placed on who? You've guessed it, each and one of us will have to to pay it off eventually. And do they ask us if we consent to this? Our economies are already suffering, but hey, according to our media the Russians are suffering more, so we got to beat them to it and keep going. They want to bring Ukraine in EU as soon as possible, even though we do not even know its final borders at this stage, and they blast Hungary for refusing and it is quite frankly, the most reasonable nation in EU right now. Ukraine was not ready to join the EU before the war, it is surely less ready to do so now.

Some countries however, like the United Kingdom found a new way to raise funds for this war; by forcing ex-Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich to release £2.5 billion for Ukraine. Britain aparently is giving the Russian "oligarch" a final chance to give Ukraine the funds, from the sale of top English soccer team Chelsea or face potential legal action. Abramovich has previously sought more flexibility and said he wants the money to go to all victims. He has 90 days to act under the terms of the government's new license.

In other words, either is Abramovich in favor of the invasion conducted by his own country against Ukraine or not, he will have to pay for it just because... he is Russian and rich! That level of desperation by the EU and European governments, indicate that it is Europe that is in fact in trouble and not America or Russia. The sense of emergency and illogical approaches, often illegal, always indicate who is acting out of need or fear.

And all that, while the US is brewing yet another conflict in Latin America, as if the American and European tax payers having to pay for one war is not bad enough; never mind the ever growing threat of an all-out war in our world, which comes closer to reality the more the Ukraine conflict lingers on.

Apparently the US has seized recently a second sanctioned vessel in international waters off the coast of Venezuela. The move comes after US President Donald Trump ordered a "blockade" of sanctioned oil tankers entering and leaving the country. Venezuela has previously accused Washington of seeking to steal its oil resources. In recent weeks, the US has been building up its military presence in the Caribbean Sea and has carried out deadly strikes on alleged Venezuelan drug-smuggling boats, killing around 100 people. The US has provided no public evidence that these vessels were carrying drugs, and the military has come under increasing scrutiny from Congress over the strikes.

Why are we getting a deja-vu feeling here? America lying or not being clear of his actions and military operations. Are they preparing another war or invasion? Most likely. US President Donald Trump stated recently that Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro's days "are numbered". Now imagine if Russia every made such statements. Imagine if any other nation across the globe, so blatantly made threats to overthrow another nation's leader, without the full support of that country's people. However Europe seems unbothered by such actions and are solely focusing on punishing Russia.

If we ever going to be taken seriously on global affairs, we cannot seem to be a US puppet. Not that we are not by this stage, but if we always turn a blind eye on one nation's actions, while we are outraged so much by another's that we are willing to shoot our own foot, in order to massage our self perceived higher sense of morality, can this really do us any favors in the long term? Our leaders seem to huff and puff about Russia's actions, but when America is being the bully they seem unbothered. Despite that in the recent years the American leadership under Trump, is constantly undermining and redefining the Trans-Atlantic relations and traditional alliance.

Not that we are not used to European and Western hypocricy; in a recent scandal in Italy, wealthy foreigners paid £80k to shoot civilians in besieged Sarajevo, Italian prosecutors claim. They are examining allegations that during the 1990s, far-right extremists and gun enthusiasts from Italy, the United States, Russia and other countries travelled to Bosnia and paid Serbian forces to let them fire at city residents as a form of “war tourism”.

Additionally,a British journalist has alleged that while travelling through conflict zones over the past two decades, he was offered the opportunity to shoot civilians, describing the practice as neither “dark tourism” nor adventurism, but “murder”. Andrew Drury, has spent years travelling through some of the world’s most dangerous regions, including Somalia, Afghanistan, Chechnya and Iraq.

So while the West is scolding others on human rights, while they punished Serbia for the massacres in Bosnia, as they tarnished the country's reputation for ever, wealthy Westerners participated in such attrocities and they will never be brought to justice for hunting humans like animals. Surely this was known in some political or journalistic circles in Europe and America long ago, but it was easier to use the human suffering that people known to them inflicted onto the people of these regions to promote their desirable agenda. Plus, surely this is still happening today in Ukraine and Palestine too- you do the maths. I am sure that many of the ills that are inflicted upon regions of this world throughout our modern history, are initiated, perpetuated, exploited by the wealthy of this planet, to the detriment of humanity's dignity and unity.

The hypocrisy, corruption and utter lunacy that prevails in our world is sickening and desperate at this stage. However this is only an indicator of a "dying beast", which clings to life by roaring the loudest at its end of days. This beast is the mighty Western hegemony that ruled this world for centuries. America may come out of this political, economic, moral and societal crisis we are going through, in a better state than Europe, as they managed to dominate our continent since WW2. But for Europe I am afraid, this could be a definitive moment and we are edging towards the point of no return.

Our leaders are blinded by power mongering, refusing to accept reality or listen to the needs of their citizens, desperate to keep face as they frolic their inflatable egos and sense of a higher morality and they will destroy Europe in the end. The question is now what will we, the citizens of Europe do to prevent this?

Trump and Putin humiliate Europe in Alaska.

During the recent meeting in Alaska between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump, it was strikingly obvious that Europe was sidelined... again! Despite European tax payers having to see billions of their taxes being spend in support of Ukraine, plus all the sanctions, rhetoric, fear and war mongering they had to endure by their leaders and elites, no single European leader, not even Zelensky himself was invited to participate in this meeting, regarding the conflict in his own country.

The two statesmen decided to discuss, albeit not coming to an agreement just yet, the future of Ukraine and the outcome of this war. Important European heads of state, members of the NATO alliance, a military block which Ukraine is aspiring to join and which all the fuss is allegedly about, were publicly left out and shunned, regardless the calls from EU and Ukrainian leaders, that "no decision for Ukraine, without Ukraine". Wow!

What one could make from all this, is that firstly Europe needs to wake up. We got leaders not fit for purpose and they are leading us based not on realpolitik and in sync with the new reality the world is heading towards to, but they are still stuck in post WW2 rhetorics and outdated ideologies. They regurgitate the same nonsense which kept our continent stuck to the hip of USA for the past decades, when even the US leadership itself is turning away from them lately. The ever sacred Euro-Atlantic alliance is no more.

... If it ever was in reality. European leaders were so used to bow their heads to the US "saviors" and getting rewarded for it with political careers in their countries, or EU and NATO institutions. They were happy to let America pay for European defense, while they sold out our banks, industries and even our land and culture to the highest bidder in exchange. All in the name of this sacred "alliance". However, no matter how much Europe hopped on one foot to satisfy US demands, it did not spare it from Trump's recent trade war and tariffs, did it?

And while Europeans are stuck in their morals, ethics and ideologies about international law- no matter how many times they, while following their US overlords had to break it, the new US leadership goes and gives them a good slap in the face and shows them that in the end, they again have the last say; despite the fact that Europeans made equal amount of sacrifices to support Ukraine, if not more, since our contributions to this conflict surpass those of USA.

Not to mention poor Ukraine, whose population is being sacrified on the chess board between USA and Russia, their country ravaged and destroyed and only Putin is blamed by our media, not the West itself, whose interests are also damaging the country and perpetuating this war, to the detriment of everyone. And when anyone- like myself- dared ever to state that this war is not winnable and that we should negotiate and compromise in order to avoid further escalation of this conflict, or further destruction of Ukraine, we were branded by many as "Putinists" and "Russian trolls".

Well, there you have it now, a US President trying to end this conflict without Europe, giving leverage to Putin by rolling the red carpet to him in Alaska and signaling a turn in American interests. The world is changing, BRICS are expanding, dedollarisation is in full swing and yes, if America wants to stay relevant it needs to negotiate, be flexible and adjust to the new realities. The problem is when will Europe do the same?

We are heading towards a multipolar world, when new alliances and economic, military and political realities will emerge, so our continent must adapt accordingly. Instead of sticking to the past sense of grandiose of dominance, decision making based on ideologies and a moral compass which is against some "aggressors" or "dictators", while is very happy to do business with some others because it suits our interests, we better do what America itself under Trump is doing and start playing ball with everyone.

Ukraine's war was always about its resources, the wealth that comes with it and power. It was never about NATO membership, democracy, freedom and all the other sentimental mumbo-jumbo our leaders are spewing to their feeble voters. It can never be won by Ukraine alone, not unless USA and Europe go to war with Russia, which is something nobody wants (and hopefully will never do), as it would certainly be the start if WW3. Because in their ultimate wisdom, Western leaders managed to unite Iran, China, North Korea and Russia, all nuclear powers and with anti-Western sentiments, due to their recent policies and decisions, like allowing Israel to attack Iran with its missiles, plus the long-standing US bras-de-fer with China in the South China Sea and ongoing trade war.

And sadly for Ukraine, it has to learn a bitter lesson; if you rely on anyone for your defense, either you got a choice or not, you are also a waif at the mercy of their interests. This was made clear with Zelensky's humiliation in the White House by Trump, back in February 2025. In addition, it was only a matter of time before US and European voters would start being tired of paying for an unwinnable conflict, or as it usually happens, leadership changes, new economic and political realities, or simply plain interests from the start, which required a country to be in desperate need, so that it can be in debt to the West forever, sealed its fate; to be in a double edged sword situation, either they do as they Westerners say, or they risk to lose even more land to Russia. The West has played this game many times before, in the Balkans and Greece for example. The approximately 250 billion dollars that the West has already spent in Ukraine so far, are not terms and conditions free, Ukraine will be in dept to Western nations for generations to come.

And whatever one has to say about Trump as a person or a leader, no one can deny at this stage that diplomacy is the way forward to end this disastrous conflict; not more armaments, rhetorics, blame game, propaganda and sanctions- which haven't worked deterring Russia from gaining even more ground latelly in Ukraine. The only problem is, that Europeans are stuck in their narrow mindedness, corruption, idealism and perceived moral superiority, that even their revered US elites are lately turning away from them and choose diplomacy with Putin, allowing him to land on American soil for negotiations, despite an existing International Criminal Court arrest warrant against him since 2023.

Will Europeans choose to carry the can of supporting Ukraine by themselves from now on, or will they lose face and accept the new reality? My bet is that they will opt for the first option, judging from their staunch and rigid approach in this conflict from the start. What will they say to their voters, how can they save face and their cherished political careers, when for years were acting with no consent by the European citizens, terrorising them that if Russia wins then they will attack Europe next and conquer it all the way to Lisbon, when the Russians clearly cannot- or have no interest in taking the whole of Ukraine, just to funnel billions of tax payers money to fund this war?

And they will keep up with this fantasy even when it is clear that Russia is winning, nobody in Europe and America is actually willing to send troops to Ukraine and go to war with Russia- so all we are achieving is hurting our own economies, risking a greater conflict, destroying Ukraine for generations to come, benefiting the Western arms industries which are the only ones gaining from this war, submitting our continent ever more to US interests and economy, while ridiculing ourselves and any aspirations we ever had for Europe to become a strong political global player, with a significant voice and influence in the world. Well, Trump and Putin just bursted that bubble and while there is no surprise from the Russians, when will it sink in that our "cousins" the Americans have not our best interests at heart, nor any respect for our continent and especially our leaders, who see as irrelevant to this war at this stage?

photo credit Katie Couric Media