For the past decade, there have been not one, but
three wars raging right at Europe’s borders. The most known and reported is the
one in Syria, which has forced millions of refugees into our continent, however
we cannot be too complacent about what is happening in Ukraine and even more so,
in Libya.
Since the NATO backed overthrowing and killing of the
Colonel Muammar Gaddafi in 2011, the North African nation has experienced
instability, two civil wars and a growing foreign intervention. Most of Europe
was focusing on its internal troubles like Brexit, however it recently became
apparent that this conflict should not be ignored.
Thus-and rightly so- the German Chancellor Angela Merkel
organized in Berlin a Conference for Libya on the 19th of January. Invitations were sent
to both warring parties of Libya, the Tripoli based GNA and its leader Fayez al-Serraj,
plus the Tobruk Government’s (HoR) Libyan National Army General, Khalifa
Haftar.
With them, a selection of foreign powers with
interests in the region were also invited, most of them already present and
engaging in the conflict, siding with either party. The leaders of France,
Turkey, Russia, Italy and the United Kingdom, together with US Secretary of
State Mike Pompeo were present.
In addition, representatives from the EU, the African
Union, the UN, the Arab League, Egypt, UAE, DR Congo, China and Algeria.
The Conference’s outcome seems to have been
successful, if only the participants- especially the two rivals in Libya and their
foreign supporters, stick to what it has been agreed; that is an end to any interference
in the country's ongoing civil conflict, plus to uphold a UN arms embargo.
Twice
before, in Paris and in Palermo similar agreements were made, but not upheld.
In addition, there was a failed effort for mediation by Greece in 2016 between
Libya and Egypt and in 2011 between Gaddafi’s regime and NATO. Thus, one would
wonder, why now Greece was excluded from the talks, since it has played an
active role before.
Many
in the Balkan nation, were angered by Germany’s snub towards Greece, especially
since Turkey’s President, Mr Erdogan was present. The German government chose
to keep the reasons away from the public knowledge, while many notable Greek
politicians such as Dora Bakoyanni, called the move “a mistake”.
Yet,
there are many reasons why the German initiative should be applauded, although
they could have involved Greece in some ways. The US has hinted that Libya is
mainly Europe’s problem and it avoided until now in getting actively involved,
apart from sporadic attacks on ISIL targets.
To fill this void, Turkey and Russia have both stepped in, each siding
with a rival warring group. In order to promote its interests, Turkey has
signed two agreements with CNA, one on maritime borders and the other on military cooperation.
The first one has hit a nerve with Greece, as it considers the maritime
memorandum a violation of international law and an attack on its sovereign
rights.
Turkey and
Greece have seen their relations deteriorating the past few years, with Turkey
trying its best to interfere or sabotage the developments in East Mediterranean
and the successful cooperation between Cyprus, Israel and Greece on gas
exploration.
Bitter because
it has been left out, Turkey went on to sign its own deal with Libya, although not
only it is illegal, it is supported by no one. Both the US and the EU have thrown
their support around Greece, yet sadly only in words.
The EU has
numerous times condemned Turkey’s actions around Cyprus and East Mediterranean;
however, it has until now avoided to actively and decisively penalize Erdogan’s
antics. Similarly, the US government although supportive of Greece, they are too
passive when it comes to Turkey, a major and valuable ally of theirs in the
Middle East.
The whole
dispute between the two NATO “allies” is around the right to oil and gas
exploration, just as in Libya. It is such a pity that Turkey is not focusing on
its recent successes, such as launching their first ever Turkish made
automobile and its own economy, but instead is trying to bully two EU member
states- Greece and Cyprus- while extending their sphere of influence.
Such attitudes
have kept the whole region backwards and harmed the economies of both Greece
and Turkey. The latter is now to trying to infringe on Greek national maritime territory-
all the way close to the island of Crete- in order to satisfy the megalomaniac
plans of Mr Erdogan and his government.
Turkey maintains that the Greek islands do not constitute Greek
sovereign rights on the continental shelf. In this way, it wants to extend
its right to drill all the way deep in Greek waters. It is only to be seen when
Europe will truly treat Greek and Cypriot national maritime borders as European,
acting accordingly and cutting the appetites of Erdogan once and for all.
Because of
Turkey, Greece was forced to intervene in the Libyan crisis and declare
allegiance with HoR. The Greek government invited the group’s leader Khalifa
Haftar in talks prior the Berlin Conference, plus it clearly indicated that it would
block any decision adopted by the EU regarding
Libya, unless the Turkey-GNA maritime deal is cancelled.
Until now,
EU member states were fragmented or indifferent towards the Libya conflict, too
absorbed by Brexit and Syria at best. Italy is supportive of the Tripoli based GNA,
while France and the UK switched sides according to their and US interests. Now
that Greece is forced to enter the game by Turkey’s antics and Germany by its
own accord, it is evident that this conflict is becoming a European issue.
If we
leave Russia backing HoR and Turkey supporting GNA, we will have an outcome
that ultimately will affect Europe, but without any of our input or our interests
protected and promoted.
Germany
might have made a blunder by not inviting Greece to the talks, or it may just
have saved the day. With a Turkey so hostile towards Greece, if the two were engaged
in the Conference, it could possibly derail any agreement and turned it into
another heated debate and diplomatic incident between the two.
That was
not the point of such meeting after all. Besides, Greece has not attained a
great record of diplomatic success in the region previously. Plus, Erdogan was
unable to get what he wanted from the Conference and had to-seemingly at least-
accept a ceasefire, a UN arms embargo and a peacefully resolution to the conflict.
No word was
made about the Greek concerns, at least not openly and the Germans with their
European counterparts were wise this time around to avoid it. It is always
better to focus on one issue and not try to carry two melons under one arm. However,
if there should be a continuation in this dispute, Greece cannot be ignored
again.
At least
not since it pledged and showed interest in sending together with France, Germany
and other European nations, a military mission to monitor the ceasefire. It is
the country of entry for many refugees from the Middle East and Africa, it has
maritime borders with Libya and since Turkey’s stance, will be most affected by
the Libyan civil war outcome.
Following
the Berlin Conference over Libya, Europe is debating about what path to follow
next. Ministers are currently in Brussels, discussing ways of how to treat
Turkey, with Hungary being one of the states opposing sanctions against its aggression
towards Greece.
Another
topic is focusing on the realization, that since Europe needs to secure the
outcome of the Conference, it really needs to get both militarily and
politically involved, even if it is with the collaboration of the UN and the
African Union.
In
conclusion, Merkel’s initiative has finally got Europe talking about Libya and
Turkey. It now only remains to be seen how able EU member states can be, in
showing solidarity with a member state, leadership in the region and agreeing decisively
on a matter that can shape their future.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.