Many euro-sceptics are shouting and demanding that Europe and EU does
not proceed into a political union,and nation states do not lose their
autonomy and "freedom". To me that is interpreted as
"no to a fully functioning European Parliament, if any at all". No governance on European level, rather just
trade. An EFTA/EEA kind of thing.
Well if we ignore the fact that any parliament is the base for a
functioning democracy, and they accuse of EU not being democratic enough
(how odd is that? Accusing for lack of democracy but then you reject
the best democratic tool is being given to you), do we really want a
Europe that is just a big market?
A big bazaar that companies and
multinationals can sell their products and buy things. And we have NO
say over what is happening in that market. A market that will affect us
all directly since we are this market, while the rules and laws of this liberal
"open" market apply to us all!
That is what
is Europe at the moment,and see what problems we get. Problems that we
have no way of controlling, since our governments do not necessarily advise us of
their decisions and how they are going to affect us. The problems are being discussed on an intergovernmental level.
Leaders
from all European countries participate in summits and forums,
discussing ways of moving forward. But we are not informed on what is
being discussed or asked for our opinion.
Isn't it better to have a stronger European Parliament with more
responsibilities, roles, controls and since we can vote for our
representatives and participate into the decisions taken in it, have a voice and say in the decisions?
A
very important thing would be to be able to see what is being
discussed in it. Rather being kept in the dark and rely on our national
politicians who are most likely to blame their failings to EU. If you
think about it, our governments and the bodies they form or nominate
like the EU Council, or the
EU Commission are the ones who control the EU at the moment, while
the EP is weaker than it should.
So our governments fail us
twice,one in national and one in European level. But unfortunately
Europeans are not yet ready to accept that they belong in
federal-like entity. Thus we are going politically in circles, always
lingering somewhere in the middle and covering up our problems. When the
solution is far more simpler.
We have created the EU and it has
offered us so many benefits. But like all things, it must evolve to be
ever successful. With a changing world and different circumstances in
every decade so it also must change.
But what we are doing is
patching things up, unwilling to allow the EU to evolve into what it
was meant to be by its founding fathers. Nationalism, protectionism and
conservatism prevails and the interests of the few political, industrial
or financial elites of each country are being served. Not those of the
citizens.
To conclude, for me if EU/Europe is to stay just a big market, I think I will
oppose it. I want to have a say in Europe, as much I want to have a
say in my national affairs. But if EU is to continue it's existence, and
either we like it or not it will, then I do not want my country to be
just a supermarket stall in this huge market.
I do not want my nation to
be something that some speculators will advise investors of how much
they can make or lose money out of it, which are the best countries to
invest in and so on. I do not want my country to be treated as shares
in the stock market, as it is at the moment.
I do not think EU is democratic at the moment, or that citizens have a real say in it. The point I am trying to make is that
if EU continues to exist, I do not want it to be just about making profit,
an open market, with no consideration of it's people and their needs or wishes. If we want to
make EU democratic, we will have to support a stronger Euro-parliament. For us the ordinary citizens, there is no other option.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.